The sky-high price of speed
The rat race, we have been talking about it for years, and gurus write books full of how to escape it. And yet we have become more and more obsessed with speed. Not least in our traffic. Yes, we need to talk about speed.
Police figures show that motorists have started driving faster just about everywhere in recent years. And this obsession with speed is killing us, our children and the people we love. And all this misery and grief apparently leaves us cold. We resign ourselves to it happening. It is bad luck that happens to us. But is that so, or are speed and its attendant casualties more than coincidence?
Not accidents but choices
And then it happens again, several times a day in Belgium: a life is crushed or scarred forever, and we hear the familiar words about heartfelt sympathy and that it was a terrible accident that should never have happened ... Well, these are not accidents, but results. Of years of neglect, of years of procrastination to make our traffic safer, of design choices tailored to machines instead of people, of lax enforcement, of lobbying against speed limiting technology in cars. Of years of unconditional flow and free lane for the automobile. Nay, these are not accidents, but the direct result of a broken system that mostly ignores the most vulnerable road users.
The price of looking the other way
We could have chosen life and real freedom, but we chose cars. The jet black result of this can be found on the telling website Road Danger. And figures for the social cost of traffic unsafety also dive deeper into the red every year. In the Netherlands, they are already talking about 17, possibly 19 billion (!) euros a year. Not a cock crowing about it. Yet not a trifle, the cost we pay for speed and traffic unsafety. But we always choose to look the other way. Or what about the first Belgian tests with ISA (Intelligent Speed Adaptation) in Ghent? These took place more than 20 years ago (!) in 2002, with promising effects on drivers' attitudes and behaviour. Many participants wanted to keep their ISA with 'active accelerator' even after the trial! In terms of acceptance of the technology, that could count. Only no one has done anything with those results until today.
The proposal Europe is currently tinkering with to treat drivers to an irritating beep if they drive too fast (you can just switch it off if you don't like it!), we rather regard as a ridiculously diluted version of ISA technology. Clever lobbying by the car industry, though. Renault' s recent announcement to limit their cars to 180 km/h is more an example of being able to but not wanting to.
So where to start?
It seems an almost impossible question. A huge mountain of work remains to be done, but only by starting it will it be reduced. Whether the experiment with the'bike chit' that speeders will soon receive with their fine works remains to be seen. Occasionally, some cities take concrete steps to bring down road speed. Leuven, for instance, is extending the 30 zone to all its boroughs by the end of 2021. This means that cars, mopeds and cyclists will now be allowed to drive no faster than 30 km/h on most streets in Kessel-Lo, Wilsele, Wijgmaal and Heverlee, in addition to Leuven centre. But despite all the small steps in the right direction, the key question remains: what are all those cars actually doing in our residential areas, in our school environments and town centres? The bottom line is that we need to work on reducing motorised traffic and need many more car-free residential and school streets. So that we first start reducing in numbers before we start reducing speeds. Or maybe a combination of both will have a reinforcing effect? In any case, plenty of research exists. Now is the time to choose humans over machines in real life too. Only then will we get change with long-term impact.
Scheduling inertia again
Whatever the price tag, it is high time for change on our streets. Too many families have had to experience how inhumanly high the price is if we don't choose real change. However, the call for change is loud enough. Now it is up to you, policymakers, traffic experts, engineers, planners and other -logists and specialists. The safety of our children, your children and everyone we love depends 100% on your decisions. Plan inertia urgently back into our traffic. Plan and build to suit people and not machines that suppress our humanity. In the meantime, we continue to work from the bottom up, and with more and more like-minded pacesetters, to build healthy streets, neighbourhoods, cities on a human scale.
Deze blog is geïnspireerd door het boek ‘Het recht van de snelste’ van Thalia Verkade en Marco Te Brömmelstroet. Dit boek doet op een heel bevattelijke en griezelig efficiënte manier uit de doeken hoe snelheid en het #voorruitpersectief onze steden én ons denken in een houdgreep hebben.
Questions after reading this article?
Let us know using the form below, and we'll get back to you soon with more information.
Related insights
Rome toont de weg naar inclusieve deelmobiliteit
Hoe kan deelmobiliteit bijdragen tot een veerkrachtigere en meer op mensen gerichte mobiliteit? Op die vraag zochten professionals en politici uit meer dan 12 EU-landen naar antwoorden op de CIVINET 2-daagse in Rome. Wij zetten de belangrijkste bevindingen op een rijtje.
Holidays by Train: the easy, affordable way
Our new colleague Bram is an avid train traveler. He’s journeyed from Rome to Abisko by train himself. He’s sharing his best tips and favorite tools so that you, too, can travel easily and affordably by train throughout Europe. Check out his golden travel tips now!
Creating people-friendly streets
Streets should prioritise people over cars. Through creative campaigns, temporary interventions and experiments, we show how cities and towns can reclaim space for walking, cycling and community life.